Categories
worldcon writing

[Worldcon] Violence in Fantasy

Friday (August 31) at 1030: Violence in Fantasy
Panelists listed in program: Scott Lynch, D. H. Aire, James Enge, Doug Hulick

Disclaimer: These are my notes from the panel and my own, later thoughts. I often was unable to attend the entire panel, and also chronically missed panelist introductions. When possible I try to note who said something, but often was unable to. Also, unless something is in double quotes it should be considered a summary and not a direct quotation. 

Scott Lynch: You can’t just set Doug Hulick on fire.
Me (from the crowd): Maybe you can’t.
Crowd: applause

The panel mostly focused on how much violence is too much, when is it gratuitous. The conclusion seemed to be that it’s not gratuitous if it’s necessary to the story, but you shouldn’t just be using it as a way to get yourself out of a corner you’ve written yourself into.

Also, violence acts as a symbol of agency for readers, so they can feel they can palpably affect events for the better within the world.

The question is when does emphasizing violence as agency become pathological? No good answers for that. People need to be able to know the difference between wish fulfillment violence and it being appropriate in the real life.

So should the bad guys be humanized or no? Split view there. Orcs should be gross and evil. (But this is something I never really liked because reality is not that black and white.)

Also, what about gross out? Well, horror is best, terror is next best, and if you can’t get either gross-out will work. (Stephen King paraphrase) Sometimes you just want to do that to your readers.

#
I don’t have a whole lot to say about this panel – it was mostly just very entertaining, and I got to heckle Scott Lynch from the crowd like an asshole. I regret nothing
I do think the idea that violence is a symbol of agency is an interesting one. Sf/f tends to have a lot of stories in it that do involve violence, particularly ones with quest plotlines. If nothing else, that means reading them takes us to a very different place beyond just the setting. Most of us will never participate in violence like that in our lives, and it is a very palpable symbol of acting directly upon the world and whatever problem is at hand. (Hell, if we ever come up against violence in our lives, there’s a good chance it will be as a victim of that violence.)
I’m not a fan of sf/f where things are extremely black and white. I like to see characters struggling with difficult decisions. And violence plays into that because it becomes a difficult, painful thing when the struggle isn’t black and white. That’s something I’ve really enjoyed about the Vorkosigan books so far, for example. 
Chandler’s Law got mentioned – “When in doubt, have a man come through the door with a gun in his hand.” There was some lively discussion around this, because it’s something that could really go well or poorly. Sometimes the man with the gun can open up all sorts of new plot possibilities – who is the man? Why is he coming after the characters? But there’s a major chance it’ll just scream hey I totally wrote myself into a corner
I’ve never had to resort to Chandler’s Law, myself. I’m really hoping that I never do. 
One thing I wondered (and maybe they covered this but I missed it) how much sf/f is actually being viewed as too violent. I can see this being an issue in video games and movies, since of course there’s a visual representation of that violence – and yeah, a lot of them just have action scenes for the sake of blowing shit up. But perhaps I’ve been lucky in my choice of books; I’ve yet to encounter one where I felt it was really overly violent or gory. (I’ve only encountered one book in my life that I found truly over the top, and that was American Psycho; that book actually made me physically ill. I also generally don’t read horror.) If nothing else, trying to have violence in the written word the way it exists in a movie would be… difficult to accomplish. And probably incredibly boring to read.
Categories
gender lgbt worldcon writing

[Worldcon] Writing Gender Roles in Science Fiction

Friday (August 31) at 0900: Writing Gender Roles in Science Fiction
Panelists listed in program: Joan D. Vinge, Julia Rios, Catherine Lundoff, Victor Raymond, Anne Lyle (Note: Joan D. Vinge was definitely not in attendance.)

Disclaimer: These are my notes from the panel and my own, later thoughts. I often was unable to attend the entire panel, and also chronically missed panelist introductions. When possible I try to note who said something, but often was unable to. Also, unless something is in double quotes it should be considered a summary and not a direct quotation. 

Works in which characters that are outside gender norms but not as a reaction to an oppressive government (incomplete list):

  • Diana Comet and Other Improbable Stories – Sandra McDonald
  • Bone Dance – Emma Bull
  • The Tawny Man trilogy and The Farseer trilogy – Robin Hobb. (Everyone tends to refer to the Fool as male but it clearly is not quite in the binary.)
  • The Einstein Intersection – Samuel R. Delaney
  • The Female Man – Joanna Russ
  • Fly Into Fire – Susan J. Bigelow (Transwoman protagonist)
  • Dragonsbane and Sisters of the Raven – Barbara Hambley

George R. R. Martin does a lot of good stuff particularly with his older women – as working within strictures of misogynistic society. Early books at least, Anne Lyle has issues with the later books it sounds like. Goes off the rails bit after the first book.

Writing characters of different genders; do you consciously decide to present them in ways you consider “good”?
Catherine Lundhoff: In sf/f there are very few female werewolves. There are very few middle-aged men already as protagonists, there are even fewer middle-aged women as protagonists. They tend to just be the evil queen.
Anne Lyle: I just write people and see how they turn out.

Mary Robinette Kowal – “Jane Austen with magic.” First book very traditional, second book (Glamour and Glass) has main character after she’s married, in Belgium at the point Napoleon comes out of exile. Goes into a war situation as a married woman who has strict social moors and must break out of it for reasons of plot.

Lois McMaster Bujold – Cordelia, working within the restrictive society to try to open minds while playing by their rules. The Vorkosigan saga “A Civil Campaign” is a comedy of manners set in scifi.

Audience question: Recommend stories that have alien cultures with something beyond the gender binary (e.g. 3 genders, etc)?
Source Decay in Strange Horizons

I asked for examples of transmen in sf/f since there had been several named for transwomen:

  • The Courier’s New Bicycle – Kim Westwood
  • A Civil Campaign – Lois McMaster Bujold
  • Steel Beach – John Varley
  • Recognizing Gabe – Alberto Yáñez (Strange Horizons)
  • Supervillainz – Alicia Goranson [ETA: Catherine Lundoff tweeted this one to me today]

Also, it was noted that transmen (and transwomen) are much more common in erotica than in sf/f. I very nearly stumped the panel with this question.

#

I thought this was a solid panel with good discussion, though I missed a significant portion of it. I actually ended up buying a copy of Catherine Lundoff’s Silver Moon in part because of this panel. There really aren’t older female protagonists very often, and I’m charmed by the idea of one being a werewolf.

The reason I asked the question about characters who are transmen is I’ve noticed generally that transwomen seem to be a bit more visible in pop culture and sf/f. Sometimes it’s very negative (eg: news stories about a transwoman being attacked are far more common than those about transmen) and on the more positive side I’ve seen more transwomen activists than transmen. When there are trans characters in the genres I read (and this happens rarely as it is) they’re almost always transwomen.

I wonder if this is partially because transwomen are to a certain extent more transgressive than transmen. From the viewpoint of a society where being white and male is still the “norm” it must seem more transgressive for a man to “wish to be” a woman than for a women to “wish to be” a man, because it’s a movement counter to the center of power.

Transmen also seem to have better luck “flying under the radar” than transwomen. (Transmen – nature’s ninja?) I wonder if this is connected to the way, say, drag queens tend to be far more culturally visible than drag kings. There’s the titillation factor, of course. But there’s also the fact that if you see someone your brain identifies as female, if they’re dressed in male clothes it doesn’t tend to really register in the same way someone who may be male in female clothes does. Women regularly wear men’s clothes, or clothes that are styled after those men wear.

Of course, this is on my mind because I’ve got a short story in which the main character is a transman. (And the plot for a novel as well, yikes.) Here’s hoping I can find a magazine that’ll want it at some point…

Anyway, I’m hoping we generally see more diversity in characters in the future, and not just in regards to gender. The fact that people are having conversations about this is definitely a step in the right direction. And of course, with more e-publishing and small presses springing up like wildflowers, I’m hoping to see more diversity as well.

ETA: Catherine Lundoff has a more complete reading list from the panel at her livejournal.

Categories
worldcon

Random bits from my second day at Worldcon

I’m having so much more fun here than I had at Denvention. This is probably because I’m not not in the middle of a twelve-credit summer semester and learning Japanese from the yuurei in the Prince of Darkness’ closet. Getting to actually attend most of the con is certainly helping.

#

I got to have dinner with the lovely gentlemen from Machine of Death. I already was acquainted with Matthew Bennardo since I’m one of his weirdo Twitter stalkers. But I also got to meet David Malki. And thanks to him, I have something wonderful to share with you: Ulli’s Roy Orbison in Cling-Film Website

You’re welcome. Read the first story. Out loud if you can. With a German accent if possible. (It really does read like slash, only better. And hilarious.)

#

The SFWA table and suite seem to be competing over which gets to eat my soul first. I’ve been at the table for an hour and a half each day at least. But it’s been fun, since I’ve gotten to meet a lot of other SFWA people that way and have had some good conversations.

Then I go to the suite and instead of sitting and having a beer (my normal plan) I end up slicing strawberries or helping unfuck the room after a party. It’s actually kind of fun, to feel like I’m helping out. Then I get to grab a plate of potato salad and a sammich and run back downstairs, consuming most of it in the elevator.

Today someone did make fun of me for putting miracle whip on white bread. I guess I deserved that.

#

The Strange Horizons tea party today was excellent. I got to officially meet all the new editorial staff, which was exciting.

And there was cake.

About that cake.

(If you don’t spot why this is hilarious, look again.)

#

I have been taking copious notes in all the panels I’ve attended. Once I have time, I’ll be getting those sorted out and adding my own thoughts, then posting them on the blog. So keep an eye out for that. I’ve found the panels very interesting so far, so hopefully you will too!

I also found out today that (a) there was a vote on whether or not there’d be a Hugo for Young Adult novels, and (b) the vote failed. This was all kind of a surprise to me. I’m going to be saying a few things about that as well, since I can’t imagine I’m the only one who didn’t see that coming in any way, but a little later. I can’t be coherent about it right now.

#
Worldcon in 2013 will be in San Antonio, TX. In 2014 it will be in London, UK – technically it’s not confirmed yet but they are running their bid unopposed so it’s pretty much a foregone conclusion.
If you like science fiction and fantasy, particularly reading and writing, you should start thinking about your travel plans now. I hope to see you there. (I’ve already bought my membership for London 2014.)
#

Valuable lesson learned: when you’re having Chicago deep-dish pizza, don’t send a slice into your stomach with a buddy. They can wreak exponentially more havoc when they can watch each other’s backs. So tonight I’m quietly partying in my room with a can of ginger ale.

Valuable lesson number two: when a man complains that two pieces of pizza might not be enough to slay his reasonable hunger, this should not be taken as a sign that two pieces is the ideal size of a meal.

Valuable lesson number three, completely unrelated to the first two: A panel about feminism in fantasy is probably not the place to look for sympathy toward your hypothesis that Buffy the Vampire Slayer is in some way emasculating and demeaning toward men because Xander is insufficiently badass.

Categories
people don't suck worldcon

Shut up and dance.

Let me tell you a little story about why you should shut up and dance.

I don’t like to dance. I feel fat and ungainly and uncoordinated. I get red-faced and sweaty and generally feel gross. Nothing I wear looks good on me when I’m standing still, let alone when I’m flailing around and showing off my lack of moves and rhythm.

Years ago I went to both of my proms, junior and senior. I didn’t dance much at my junior prom, because of the above reasons. I just sort of hovered at the tables and drank punch. My senior prom, well… that was with my first boyfriend and that’s a whole can of worms I’d rather not open right now.

So when I saw that Worldcon would have a geek prom, I decided I would go, and finally have a good prom where I had fun instead of teenaged drama. I even tried to find a “nerd date,” to no avail. Not wanting to go by myself, I almost chickened out when my last panel ended, but I swung by the ballrooom and poked my head in. People looked like they were having fun. I went up to my room and got changed into my fancier clothes.

When I got back down to the ballroom, I sat at the tables. And watched people dance. And felt stupid and awkward and lonely, because everyone was having fun and I was by myself. What was I even doing? If I was just going to sit, it was a waste of time. Then the DJ decided to play “Stayin’ Alive” and it was just too funny. I had to get up. It was scary. I felt stupid. I kind of hopped around on my own and felt even dumber. I found the spine to sidle up to a group of women and ask if I could join them. And we all danced.

You know what happened?

No one gave a shit. No one looked at me. No one cared that I’m ungainly and silly and was dripping sweat. We laughed, and smiled, and had fun.

You know what else happened?

I kept dancing, even when my group went away. I danced with complete strangers. I danced by myself. If I saw someone that looked lonely, I went and danced with them. We all had fun. We danced the Time Warp (again). I danced until I had to take off my shoes. I sweated through my jacket. I found a little dedicated group of three other people and we outlasted the DJ.

This is the lie we tell ourselves: we should be afraid of being silly and having fun because the next person who laughs will be laughing at us instead of with us.

It doesn’t matter. I’m telling you it doesn’t matter.

Dancing is about being alive, and joyful and human, and celebrating that fact. Dancing is not a zero-sum game or a contest. It’s like love. The more you give, the more you have. Being afraid of that is one more lie we swallow, one more way we try to trick ourselves into being less alive.

I think we should stop being afraid of other people and try to just be with them. No one’s watching. (Or if they are, fuck them, they’re joyless pricks and you don’t need their approval.) Enough excuses. Tell your insecurities and all the lies to shut up so you can dance.

Life is to short to deprive yourself of joy.